15 / 18How readiness changes

The EA Candidate Readiness Report

The historical percentages compare practice accuracy across years and exam parts. Content changes, cohort composition and question exposure can move the results. Year-to-date observations have limited evidence and cannot establish a trend.

By Jordan AshbyUpdated September 13, 2026Aggregate PassFast product data
Dataset scope

What this result includes

  • Historical practice snapshot through August 13, 2026
  • Aggregate percentages; no individual records
  • Cohort definitions and observational limits apply
01

Read annual results in context

The historical percentages compare practice accuracy across years and exam parts. Content changes, cohort composition and question exposure can move the results. Year-to-date observations have limited evidence and cannot establish a trend.

02

Keep the time window visible

Compare like periods and content versions before drawing conclusions about performance changes.

03

Interpret the evidence carefully

Evidence is uneven across groups. Descriptive percentages can guide a study question, but do not establish causation, national performance or a probability of passing.

Performance data

Learner-weighted accuracy by year and part

The historical percentages compare practice accuracy across years and exam parts. Content changes, cohort composition and question exposure can move the results. Year-to-date observations have limited evidence and cannot establish a trend.

2023 Part 1Historical practice snapshot
Accuracy63.4%
2023 Part 2Historical practice snapshot
Accuracy63.5%
2023 Part 3Historical practice snapshot
Accuracy69.9%
2024 Part 1Historical practice snapshot
Accuracy63.1%
2024 Part 2Historical practice snapshot
Accuracy63.1%
2024 Part 3Historical practice snapshot
Accuracy68.8%
2025 Part 1Historical practice snapshot
Accuracy63.1%
2025 Part 2Historical practice snapshot
Accuracy67.4%
2025 Part 3Historical practice snapshot
Accuracy71.5%
2026 YTD Part 1Historical practice snapshot
Accuracy72.2%
2026 YTD Part 2Historical practice snapshot
Accuracy66.5%
2026 YTD Part 3Historical practice snapshot
Accuracy71.3%
Source: PassFast aggregate snapshot through August 13, 2026
Annual cohort results12 rows

Percentages describe the stated historical cohort. Evidence strength and the limits below must be considered before interpreting differences. Scroll horizontally to review every column.

Annual cohort results
PeriodPartAccuracyEvidence
2023Part 163.4%Stronger
2023Part 263.5%Stronger
2023Part 369.9%Directional
2024Part 163.1%Stronger
2024Part 263.1%Stronger
2024Part 368.8%Stronger
2025Part 163.1%Stronger
2025Part 267.4%Directional
2025Part 371.5%Directional
2026 YTDPart 172.2%Limited
2026 YTDPart 266.5%Limited
2026 YTDPart 371.3%Limited
Read this result carefully

What the data cannot establish

This historical PassFast practice cohort is not representative of all SEE candidates. Smaller groups provide limited evidence. Content version, selection and prior practice can affect results. No verified official exam outcome is measured.

What this means for your next study session

Turn the finding into a decision.

Use the report to choose a focused action, then test that decision with current material. The evidence should reduce uncertainty; it should never replace the complete exam outline or promise an official result.