17 / 18How candidates practice and improve

How Note-Taking Fits Into EA Exam Practice

The percentages compare accuracy with and without recorded note activity. The cohorts are not matched and differ in study behavior, so the comparison cannot show that notes caused a change in performance.

By Jordan AshbyUpdated September 13, 2026Aggregate PassFast product data
Dataset scope

What this result includes

  • Historical practice snapshot through August 13, 2026
  • Aggregate percentages; no individual records
  • Cohort definitions and observational limits apply
01

Note use and accuracy are associated

The percentages compare accuracy with and without recorded note activity. The cohorts are not matched and differ in study behavior, so the comparison cannot show that notes caused a change in performance.

02

Write less, retrieve more

Capture the rule and deciding fact, close the note, then apply the distinction without looking.

03

Interpret the evidence carefully

Evidence is uneven across groups. Descriptive percentages can guide a study question, but do not establish causation, national performance or a probability of passing.

Performance data

Accuracy for learners with and without recorded note use

The percentages compare accuracy with and without recorded note activity. The cohorts are not matched and differ in study behavior, so the comparison cannot show that notes caused a change in performance.

Part 1Historical practice snapshot
Used notes62.1%
No recorded note use64.3%
Part 2Historical practice snapshot
Used notes62.0%
No recorded note use65.0%
Part 3Historical practice snapshot
Used notes68.5%
No recorded note use71.3%
Source: PassFast aggregate snapshot through August 13, 2026
Note use, accuracy, and practice volume3 rows

Percentages describe the stated historical cohort. Evidence strength and the limits below must be considered before interpreting differences. Scroll horizontally to review every column.

Note use, accuracy, and practice volume
PartNote-user accuracyNo-note accuracyEvidence
Part 162.1%64.3%Stronger
Part 262.0%65.0%Stronger
Part 368.5%71.3%Stronger
Read this result carefully

What the data cannot establish

This historical PassFast practice cohort is not representative of all SEE candidates. Smaller groups provide limited evidence. Content version, selection and prior practice can affect results. No verified official exam outcome is measured.

What this means for your next study session

Turn the finding into a decision.

Use the report to choose a focused action, then test that decision with current material. The evidence should reduce uncertainty; it should never replace the complete exam outline or promise an official result.